<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House #32 &#8211; We own it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buildbankroll.com/2010/02/house-32-we-own-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buildbankroll.com/2010/02/house-32-we-own-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtis gabhart</title>
		<link>http://buildbankroll.com/2010/02/house-32-we-own-it/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>curtis gabhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildbankroll.com/?p=910#comment-448</guid>
		<description>I am not sure how stringent they actually are since the ruling is so new, but the requirements are you to give them proof of the upgrades to justify the increase and an independent inspection.

Keep us posted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure how stringent they actually are since the ruling is so new, but the requirements are you to give them proof of the upgrades to justify the increase and an independent inspection.</p>
<p>Keep us posted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://buildbankroll.com/2010/02/house-32-we-own-it/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildbankroll.com/?p=910#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom, thanks for posting that, I saw it and posted about it earlier.  I wonder how stringent and carefully they run the numbers, or if it is more just to eliminate fraudulent transactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom, thanks for posting that, I saw it and posted about it earlier.  I wonder how stringent and carefully they run the numbers, or if it is more just to eliminate fraudulent transactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Tarrant</title>
		<link>http://buildbankroll.com/2010/02/house-32-we-own-it/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Tarrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildbankroll.com/?p=910#comment-427</guid>
		<description>You might want to take a look at this. You can sell for way more than 20% increase on purchase price, just have to show receipts and justify price increase. FHA is now flipper friendly!

http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/waivpropflip2010.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to take a look at this. You can sell for way more than 20% increase on purchase price, just have to show receipts and justify price increase. FHA is now flipper friendly!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/waivpropflip2010.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/waivpropflip2010.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://buildbankroll.com/2010/02/house-32-we-own-it/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildbankroll.com/?p=910#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Yes, they did suspend it.  But only for sales less than 20% of the purchase price.  Unfortunately, none of our properties fit that criteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they did suspend it.  But only for sales less than 20% of the purchase price.  Unfortunately, none of our properties fit that criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://buildbankroll.com/2010/02/house-32-we-own-it/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildbankroll.com/?p=910#comment-421</guid>
		<description>I thought the FHA 90 days rule was suspended?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the FHA 90 days rule was suspended?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
